Tham khảo Dịch vụ công

  1. McGregor Jr., Eugene B.; Campbell, Alan K.; Macy, Anthony itua; Cleveland, Harlan (July–August 1982). “Symposium: The Public Service as Institution”. Public Administration Review (Washington) 42 (4): 304–320. JSTOR i240003. doi:10.2307/975969. Bản mẫu:ProQuest
  2. “Definition of PUBLIC SERVICE”. www.merriam-webster.com (bằng tiếng Anh). Truy cập ngày 21 tháng 8 năm 2019. 
  3. Anderfuhren-Biget, Simon; Varone, Frédéric; Giauque, David (tháng 12 năm 2014). “Policy Environment and Public Service Motivation”. Public Administration (London) 92 (4): 807–825. doi:10.1111/padm.12026. Bản mẫu:ProQuest
  4. Frank, Sue A.; Lewis, Gregory B. (tháng 3 năm 2004). “Government Employees: Working Hard or Hardly Working?”. The American Review of Public Administration 34 (1): 36–51. doi:10.1177/0275074003258823
  5. Richwine, Jason (ngày 11 tháng 9 năm 2012). “Government Employees Work Less than Private-Sector Employees”. Backgrounder (The Heritage Foundation) (2724): 1–6. Truy cập ngày 16 tháng 1 năm 2016. 
  6. Ovsey, Dan (ngày 27 tháng 5 năm 2014). “Public sector stigma: The 100,000 workers Tim Hudak removes from the provincial payroll could have a tough transition to the private sector”. Financial Post. Truy cập ngày 16 tháng 1 năm 2016. 
  7. Volokh, Sasha (ngày 7 tháng 2 năm 2014). “Are public-sector employees "overpaid"?”. The Washington Post. Truy cập ngày 18 tháng 1 năm 2016. 
  8. Rice, Michael (1998). The Power of the Bull. London: Routledge. tr. 13. ISBN 978-1-317-72583-1. As the more advanced social institutions began to take shape they contributed to some counterbalancing of the essential insecurity of man's condition. It was inevitable that ambitious and assertive men should see an opportunity for establishing for themselves positions of power and influence. No doubt many such occasions had their origins in a genuine concern for the public good [...] The position of [...] the war-band leader as the strong arm of the community's defence would increasingly be confirmed by the subjection of the community to the members of what [...] were becoming, demonstrably, elites, [...] This period, embracing part of the fifth and all of the fourth and third millennia before the present era, is absolutely pivotal to the development of the modern world. 
  9. Haley, John O. (2016). Law's Political Foundations: Rivers, Rifles, Rice, and Religion. Cheltemham, Gloucestershire: Edward Elgar Publishing. tr. 43–44. ISBN 978-1-78536-850-9. Pharaonic Egypt epitomizes a regulatory, public law regime. [...] The principal function of this elaborate apparatus was to maintain order and security, and, above all, to acquire as much of the surplus agricultural wealth and labor as possible. 
  10. Hovey, Craig; Phillips, Elizabeth (2015). The Cambridge Companion to Political Theology. New York: Cambridge University Press. tr. 4–5. ISBN 978-1-107-05274-1. To ensure the favor of the gods was the preeminent task of ancient rulers worldwide, for they all were priestly kings. The Roman Caesar was the pontifex maximus of Rome's state god. The Chinese emperor certainly stood over his subjects as 'Son of Heaven,' but if he fell into disfavor with heaven and his country was visited by famine, plague, earthquakes, and floods, he could be overthrown. The Moloch of Carthage demanded children as sacrifices; the Aztecs and Mayas offered their Gods still-quivering hearts. These political religions were do ut des religions in which the relationship between deity and worshippers was one of contractual exchange.